I voted, how about you?

[4Jettheads]

Just fer fun:
Ignotum Per Ignotius is Latin for Ignorance is bliss.
The language of Catholicism-Hmm, wasn't it the Vatican that was well aware of Hilter's "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" and did nothing ?
GW Bush would know about that. He's been living in it for the majority share of his existence as a carbon based unit.

[Jett Ford]

That's amazing. A good friend of mine works for Democrat Barney Frank in D.C., and I'm gonna forward him that above piece. I'll ask him what's going on in the Capitol Building, and see if I can post anything helpful here. Maybe there's hope.
Well, wait. There's ALWAYS hope, including right now. I guess I mean to say maybe there's something to look forward to!

[CHERIECURRIE]

Thanks for the info Rocketmaster and everyone else here.
This is a touchy topic I know, but the most important.
I'm praying that Kerry comes back fighting. We need him!
I never thought we'd be in a situation like this with no end in sight and the clown of all clowns running this circus of horror.
This has been a take over of the most evil kind. We as a nation will never live it down.
I just can't believe we let it happen.... or did we? We'll soon see.
Kisses,
CC

[rocketmaster]

Published on Saturday, November 6, 2004 by CommonDreams.org

Evidence Mounts That The Vote Was Hacked

by Thom Hartmann

When I spoke with Jeff Fisher this morning (Saturday, November 06, 2004), the Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from Florida's 16th District said he was waiting for the FBI to show up. Fisher has evidence, he says, not only that the Florida election was hacked, but of who hacked it and how. And not just this year, he said, but that these same people had previously hacked the Democratic primary race in 2002 so that Jeb Bush would not have to run against Janet Reno, who presented a real threat to Jeb, but instead against Bill McBride, who Jeb beat.

"It was practice for a national effort," Fisher told me.

And evidence is accumulating that the national effort happened on November 2, 2004.

The State of Florida, for example, publishes a county-by-county record of votes cast and people registered to vote by party affiliation. Net denizen Kathy Dopp compiled the official state information into a table, available at http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm, and noticed something startling.


Also See:


Florida Secretary of State Presidential Results by County 11/02/2004 (.pdf) <http://election.dos.state.fl.us/pdf/canvassing1.pdf>
Florida Secretary of State County Registration by Party 2/9/2004 (.pdf) <http://election.dos.state.fl.us/voterreg/pdf/2004/2004pppParty.pdf>

While the heavily scrutinized touch-screen voting machines seemed to produce results in which the registered Democrat/Republican ratios matched the Kerry/Bush vote, and so did the optically-scanned paper ballots in the larger counties, in Florida's smaller counties the results from the optically scanned paper ballots - fed into a central tabulator PC and thus vulnerable to hacking - seem to have been reversed.

In Baker County, for example, with 12,887 registered voters, 69.3% of them Democrats and 24.3% of them Republicans, the vote was only 2,180 for Kerry and 7,738 for Bush, the opposite of what is seen everywhere else in the country where registered Democrats largely voted for Kerry.

In Dixie County, with 4,988 registered voters, 77.5% of them Democrats and a mere 15% registered as Republicans, only 1,959 people voted for Kerry, but 4,433 voted for Bush.

The pattern repeats over and over again - but only in the smaller counties where, it was probably assumed, the small voter numbers wouldn't be much noticed. Franklin County, 77.3% registered Democrats, went 58.5% for Bush. Holmes County, 72.7% registered Democrats, went 77.25% for Bush.

Yet in the larger counties, where such anomalies would be more obvious to the news media, high percentages of registered Democrats equaled high percentages of votes for Kerry.

More visual analysis of the results can be seen at http://ustogether.org/election04/FloridaDataStats.htm, and www.rubberbug.com/temp/Florida2004chart.htm <http://www.rubberbug.com/temp/Florida2004chart.htm> .

And, although elections officials didn't notice these anomalies, in aggregate they were enough to swing Florida from Kerry to Bush. If you simply go through the analysis of these counties and reverse the "anomalous" numbers in those counties that appear to have been hacked, suddenly the Florida election results resemble the Florida exit poll results: Kerry won, and won big.

Those exit poll results have been a problem for reporters ever since Election Day.

Election night, I'd been doing live election coverage for WDEV, one of the radio stations that carries my syndicated show, and, just after midnight, during the 12:20 a.m. Associated Press Radio News feed, I was startled to hear the reporter detail how Karen Hughes had earlier sat George W. Bush down to inform him that he'd lost the election. The exit polls were clear: Kerry was winning in a landslide. "Bush took the news stoically," noted the AP report.

But then the computers reported something different. In several pivotal states.

Conservatives see a conspiracy here: They think the exit polls were rigged.

Dick Morris, the infamous political consultant to the first Clinton campaign who became a Republican consultant and Fox News regular, wrote an article for The Hill <http://www.thehill.com/morris/110404.aspx> , the publication read by every political junkie in Washington, DC, in which he made a couple of brilliant points.

"Exit Polls are almost never wrong," Morris wrote. "They eliminate the two major potential fallacies in survey research by correctly separating actual voters from those who pretend they will cast ballots but never do and by substituting actual observation for guesswork in judging the relative turnout of different parts of the state."

He added: "So, according to ABC-TVs exit polls, for example, Kerry was slated to carry Florida, Ohio, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, and Iowa, all of which Bush carried. The only swing state the network had going to Bush was West Virginia, which the president won by 10 points."

Yet a few hours after the exit polls were showing a clear Kerry sweep, as the computerized vote numbers began to come in from the various states the election was called for Bush.

How could this happen?

On the CNBC TV show "Topic A With Tina Brown," several months ago, Howard Dean had filled in for Tina Brown as guest host. His guest was Bev Harris, the Seattle grandmother who started www.blackboxvoting.org <http://www.blackboxvoting.org/> from her living room. Bev pointed out that regardless of how votes were tabulated (other than hand counts, only done in odd places like small towns in Vermont), the real "counting" is done by computers. Be they Diebold Opti-Scan machines, which read paper ballots filled in by pencil or ink in the voter's hand, or the scanners that read punch cards, or the machines that simply record a touch of the screen, in all cases the final tally is sent to a "central tabulator" machine.

That central tabulator computer is a Windows-based PC.

"In a voting system," Harris explained to Dean on national television, "you have all the different voting machines at all the different polling places, sometimes, as in a county like mine, there's a thousand polling places in a single county. All those machines feed into the one machine so it can add up all the votes. So, of course, if you were going to do something you shouldn't to a voting machine, would it be more convenient to do it to each of the 4000 machines, or just come in here and deal with all of them at once?"

Dean nodded in rhetorical agreement, and Harris continued. "What surprises people is that the central tabulator is just a PC, like what you and I use. It's just a regular computer."

"So," Dean said, "anybody who can hack into a PC can hack into a central tabulator?"

Harris nodded affirmation, and pointed out how Diebold uses a program called GEMS, which fills the screen of the PC and effectively turns it into the central tabulator system. "This is the official program that the County Supervisor sees," she said, pointing to a PC that was sitting between them loaded with Diebold's software.

Bev then had Dean open the GEMS program to see the results of a test election. They went to the screen titled "Election Summary Report" and waited a moment while the PC "adds up all the votes from all the various precincts," and then saw that in this faux election Howard Dean had 1000 votes, Lex Luthor had 500, and Tiger Woods had none. Dean was winning.

"Of course, you can't tamper with this software," Harris noted. Diebold wrote a pretty good program.

But, it's running on a Windows PC.

So Harris had Dean close the Diebold GEMS software, go back to the normal Windows PC desktop, click on the "My Computer" icon, choose "Local Disk C:," open the folder titled GEMS, and open the sub-folder "LocalDB" which, Harris noted, "stands for local database, that's where they keep the votes." Harris then had Dean double-click on a file in that folder titled "Central Tabulator Votes," which caused the PC to open the vote count in a database program like Excel.

In the "Sum of the Candidates" row of numbers, she found that in one precinct Dean had received 800 votes and Lex Luthor had gotten 400.

"Let's just flip those," Harris said, as Dean cut and pasted the numbers from one cell into the other. "And," she added magnanimously, "let's give 100 votes to Tiger."

They closed the database, went back into the official GEMS software "the legitimate way, you're the county supervisor and you're checking on the progress of your election."

As the screen displayed the official voter tabulation, Harris said, "And you can see now that Howard Dean has only 500 votes, Lex Luthor has 900, and Tiger Woods has 100." Dean, the winner, was now the loser.

Harris sat up a bit straighter, smiled, and said, "We just edited an election, and it took us 90 seconds."

On live national television. (You can see the clip on www.votergate.tv <http://www.votergate.tv/> .)

Which brings us back to Morris and those pesky exit polls that had Karen Hughes telling George W. Bush that he'd lost the election in a landslide.

Morris's conspiracy theory is that the exit polls "were sabotage" to cause people in the western states to not bother voting for Bush, since the networks would call the election based on the exit polls for Kerry. But the networks didn't do that, and had never intended to. It makes far more sense that the exit polls were right - they weren't done on Diebold PCs - and that the vote itself was hacked.

And not only for the presidential candidate - Jeff Fisher thinks this hit him and pretty much every other Democratic candidate for national office in the most-hacked swing states.

So far, the only national "mainstream" media to come close to this story was Keith Olbermann on his show Friday night, November 5th, when he noted that it was curious that all the voting machine irregularities so far uncovered seem to favor Bush. In the meantime, the Washington Post and other media are now going through single-bullet-theory-like contortions to explain how the exit polls had failed.

But I agree with Fox's Dick Morris on this one, at least in large part. Wrapping up his story for The Hill, Morris wrote in his final paragraph, "This was no mere mistake. Exit polls cannot be as wrong across the board as they were on election night. I suspect foul play."

Thom Hartmann (thom at thomhartmann.com) is a Project Censored Award-winning best-selling author and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk show. www.thomhartmann .com <http://www.thomhartmann.com/commondreams.shtml> His most recent books are "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1400051576/commondreams-20/ref=nosim/> ," "Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1579549551/commondreams-20/ref=nosim/> ," "We The People: A Call To Take Back America <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1882109384/commondreams-20/ref=nosim/> ," and "What Would Jefferson Do?: A Return To Democracy <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1400052084/commondreams-20/ref=nosim/> ."

[4Jettheads]

Cherie Bomb, it's gonna get better. There seems to be some questions as to the Iowa electoral votes cast as well. In addition, the Republican party choose to file suit against some folks that were a bit confused since their own county representatives were confused and voted at the wrong precinct. The attorneys for the Republicans convinced the court to throw out all ballots miscast in those Iowa counties to the tune of about 25,000 so far. Seems they were loyal to Kerry counties. This is gonna get better. I can see it coming. Some of the voting ballots were so screw*d up, they left off re-election for some district court judges. Cool ! Iowa will have courtrooms and no judge to run 'em. Possibly we could resurrect the spirit of P.T Barnum to run this circus when they raise the bigtop for opening night. Wonder how the walleye fishing is in Canada right now ?

[4Jettheads]

Just one more thing. If Lex Luther is on the ballot by the preceeding post, what happened to Superman ? I want a recount. Call the Republican attorneys. Wait a minute. Luther was a vicious, domineering capitalist. Never mind. He is the Republican candidate.

[rocketmaster]

Hey Farmboy, if you pick up a current Superman comic, Lex Luthor is president, and has been for the past 4 years. [img]wink.gif[/img]

Here's part of a letter from a personal friend, beautifully and very powerfully written.


I'm being very proactive in the wake of the election. I cried for a day, then got motivated. I've been praying so hard for the people (both our soldiers and the people of Iraq) that I can feel each death.

I pray this ends soon, this tragedy, this loss of life.

We, as Americans, since the election, will now be responsible and held accountable for what the White House does in our name. The world is watching, history is being made. It is the legacy our children will inherit. This war will go down as a dark memoir in the history of a great nation.

I will not agree to disagree...or give my allegiance to any man who kills innocent children. Ever. I will not give my vote to a man who calls people evil because they had the misfortune to be born in a country ruled by a dictator. Ever. I will not support a war, where thousands are being killed, based on a lie.

This war is not worth one more life, or one more barrel of oil.

It is pure hypocrisy that the Christian evangelicals vote a man in office because he is "pro-life", a champion for the unborn who "don't have a voice", yet they support and condone the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent people Iraqi and American soldiers who are already born.

If you are pro life take a stand for ALL LIFE. I do.

[CHERIECURRIE]

If you can, please sign and pass on.
xxoxoxox


President Bush has announced his plan to select Dr. W. David Hager to head

up the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Reproductive Health Drugs

Advisory Committee. The committee has not met for more than two years,

during which time its charter lapsed. As a result, the Bush Administration

is tasked with filling all eleven positions with new members. This

position does not require Congressional approval. The FDA's Reproductive

Health Drugs Advisory Committee makes crucial decisions on matters

relating to drugs used in the practice of obstetrics, gynecology and

related specialties, including hormone therapy, contraception, treatment

for infertility, and medical alternatives to surgical procedures for

sterilization and pregnancy termination.



Dr. Hager, the author of "As Jesus Cared for Women: Restoring Women Then

and Now." The book blends biblical accounts of Christ healing Women with

case studies from Hager's practice. His views of reproductive health care

are far outside the mainstream for reproductive technology. Dr. Hager is a

practicing OB/GYN who describes himself as "pro-life" and refuses to

prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women. In the book Dr.Hager wrote

with his wife, entitled "Stress and the Woman's Body," he suggests that

women who suffer from premenstrual syndrome should seek help from reading

the bible and praying. As an editor and contributing author of "The

Reproduction Revolution: A Christian Appraisal of Sexuality reproductive

Technologies and the Family," Dr. Hager appears to have endorsed the

medically inaccurate assertion that the common birth control pill is an

abortifacient.



We are concerned that Dr. Hager's strong religious beliefs may color his

assessment of technologies that are necessary to protect women's lives to

preserve and promote women's health. Hager's track record of using

religious beliefs to guide his medical decision-making makes him a

dangerous and inappropriate candidate to serve as chair of this committee.

Critical drug public policy and research must not be held hostage by

antiabortion politics. Members of this important panel should be appointed

on the basis of science and medicine, rather than politics and religion.

American women deserve no less. There is something you can do. Below is a

statement to be sent to the White House, opposing the placement of Hager.



(1) Please copy and paste (DON'T forward) the entire email into a fresh

email; then sign your name below. After you sign, SEND THIS TO EVERY

PERSON YOU KNOW WHO IS CONCERNED ABOUT WOMEN'S RIGHTS.



(2) Every 10th person who signs the list (i.e., #10, #20, #30, etc.) -

please forward the entire e-mail to [email protected] We oppose the

appointment of Dr. W. David Hager to the FDA Reproductive Health Drugs

Advisory Committee. Mixing religion and medicine is unacceptable in a

policy-making position. Using the FDA to promote a political agenda is

inappropriate and seriously threatens women's health. Members of this

important panel should be appointed on the basis of science and medicine,

rather than politics and religion.



American women deserve no less.



1. Susan Tannenbaum ( Owings Mills,Maryland)



2. Susan Levine (SilverSpring,MD)



3. Audrey Funk (Henderson,NV)



4. Susan Lowe Shlisky (Las Vegas,NV)



5. Michelle Straub-Wilensky (Los Angeles,CA)



6. Patricia Phelan (San Francisco,CA)



7. Victoria Einhorn(san anselmo, ca)



8. Brad Einhorn(Brooklyn,NY)



9. Bethany M acMillan (Brooklyn,NY)



10. Amy Russell (Louisville,Kentucky)



11. Beverly D. Moore (Louisville,Kentucky)



12. Connie O. Byrne (Kannapolis,North Carolina)



13. Janet C. Haas (Charlotte,North Carolina)



14. Heather V rana (Charlotte,NC)



15. Clare M. Evans (Newport,VA)



16.Kathy Chadwick



17.Jim Chadwick



18.Claire Grimm Chadwick



19.Lindsay Addison (Naples,FL)



20. Peggy Addison (Naples,FL)



21. David Addison (Naples,FL)



22. Howard Schumsky (Orlando,FL)



23. Kristie Born (Orlando,FL)



24. Paul Boyd (Atlantic Highlands,NJ)



25. Lois Jensen (NYC, NY)



26. Catherine Rubenstein (Belvedere, CA)



27. Anne Rubenstein (Belvedere, CA)



28. Dirk Rubenstein (Belvedere, CA)



29. Barbara K. Westover (Oakland, CA)



30.Sharon Bjornson (Oakland, CA)



31. Rabbi Sue Levi Elwell (Philadelphia, PA)



32. Hana Elwell (Brooklyn,NY)



33. Jen Song (Brooklyn, NY) 34.



34. Janet Lo (New York,NY)



35. Emily Horowitz (New York, NY)



36. Daniel Horowitz (New York, NY)



37.Josh Hyman (New York, NY)



38. Mona Goldsmith (Plainview, NY)



39.Kate Striano (Newtown, CT)



40. Elissa Gellis ( Newtown, CT)



41. Diane Thompson (Sandy Hook, CT)



42. LInda Parsloe (Sandy Hook, CT)



43. Judy Juracek (Darien, CT)



44. Deborah Meisels (City Island, NY)



45. P. Briggs Saroch (Greenfield, MA)



46. Diane Fisher-Katz (Northampton, MA)



47. Kirsten Cirincione (Florence, MA)



48. Jane Lynch (Florence, MA)



49. Kathleen Kennedy (Santa Barbara, CA)



50. Leslie Palmer (San Antonio, TX)



51. Julie Toland, Middletown, RI



52. Josie Merck,( Cos Cob, CT)



53. Elizabeth O'Neill (Boston, MA)



54. Joan O'Neill (Traverse City, MI)



55. Barbara Becker (Concord, CA)



56. Ken Bruckmeier (Oakland,CA)



57. Margret Elson (Oakland, CA)



58, Marsha Sherman (Portland, OR)



59. Marinell Eva (Santa Rosa, CA) 60. Sharon Oman (Petaluma, CA)



61. Adrienne Davis (Santa Rosa, CA)



62. Barbara Carlson (Santa Rosa, CA)



63. Karen Grace-Kaho (Sacramento , CA)



64. Mary Beth Love (San Francisco, CA)



65. Ruth Finnerty (Oakland, CA)



66. Rosalie Holtz



67. Kay Corlett (Albany,CA)



68. Connie Barnes (Oakley, CA)



69. Donna Ventura (Brentwood, CA)



70. Nancy Herman (Lafayette,CA) 71. Shirley Chang (Berkeley, CA)



72. Nola Chavez (El Cerrito, CA)



73. Elspeth Wells (Clayton, CA)



74. Phyllis Berger (Los Angeles, CA)



75. Joan Barnett (Boston, Ma.)



76. Karen Danaher(Los Angeles,CA)



77. Susan Rice (New York, NY)



78. Alan Wagner ( New York, NY)



79. Jane Altman (New York, NY)



80. Sheila Friedman (Yardley, PA)



81. Susan Cooper (Brookfield, CT)



82. Elissa Fisher (Pleasantville, NY)



83. Angela Usobiaga (Pleasantville, NY)



84. Katherine Procopio Goodman (Katonah, NY)



85. Jessica White (Dobbs Ferry,NY)



86. Danielle Bottari (New York,NY)



87. Jennifer Getschmann (New York, NY)



88. Sung Pak (New York, NY)



89. Sharon Pak (New York, NY)



90. Pamela Gold(Jersey City, NJ)



91. Mindy Drossner (Lafayette Hill, PA)



92. Stephanie Choder (Gladwyne, PA)



93. Robin Stern (Lafayette Hill, PA)



94. Emily Newman (Syracuse, NY) 95. Mark Stern (syracuse,NY)



96. Robin Fink (Philadelphia, PA 19102)



97. Greg Rosen (New York,NY)



98, Durelle Schacter (San MAteo, CA)



99,rachel stewart (san anselmo CA)



100 Joyce Goldstein ( San Francisco)



101 Kate Slate (New York city)



102. Mardee Regan (Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY)



103. Brad Mehldau (Newburgh, NY)



104. Augusta Quirk (Summerland,CA)



105. Carolyn Furlong (St. Babs,CA)



106. Alexandra Morath (Santa Barbara, CA)



107. Talia Camarena (New York, NY)



108. Stuart Baldwin (New York, NY)



109. Julie Clarke (Chapel Hill, NC)



110. Vivian Chen (Chapel Hill, NC)



111.Sheryl Trager (New York, NY)



112. Debra Carbonaro (New York, NY)



113. Bowie Maksrivorawa (New York, NY)



114. Dawn Wetzel (Memphis, TN)



115. Posey Hedges (Memphis, TN)



116. Jim Spake (Memphis, TN)



117. Charlie Wood (Memphis, TN)



118. Kathy Kosins ( Birmingham, Michigan)



119. Dan Pliskow (Royal Oak, Mi.)



120. Susan B. Anderson (Pacifica, CA)



121. Laurence D. Anderson (Pacifica,CA)



122. Irene Spang (San Francisco, CA)



123. John L. Spang (San Francisco, CA)



124. Katherine Albrecht (San Francisco, CA)



125. Suzane Kavert (San Francisco, CA)



126. Chris Kavert (San Francisco,CA)



127. Holly Milne (San Francisco, CA)



128. Emma Tresemer ( San Francisco, CA)



129. Jennifer Black (Boulder, CO) 130.



130. Jesse Ritch (Boulder, CO)



131. Lily Fessenden (Searsmont, ME)



132. Terrence Keeney (East Montpelier, VT)



133. Penelope Stout-Hammar (Milton, VT) 134.



134. Susannah Hammar (Medford, MA)



135. Leslie Stephenson (Riverdale, NY)



136. Marisa Mann (Woodmere, NY)



137. Stacey Ganina (Riverdale, NY)



138. Alex Kehl (New York, NY)



139. Elissa Leonard (Freeport, ME)



140. Maria Dewees (Waltham, MA)



141. Bennet Leon (Sudbury, MA)



142. Maria Jenness (Newport, VT)



145. Allie Leib (Ridgefield, CT)



146. Mathy Mezey (Ardsley, NY)



147. Ariel Samuelson (Newton, MA)



148. Lucy Joffe (Newton, MA)



149. Jake Joffe (Newotn, MA)



150. Robert L. Klein (Newton, MA)



151. Kenneth Leeser (Newton, MA)



152. Melinda Brown (Newton, MA)



153.Kathryn Bender



154. Stephen Bober



155. Melanie Lukens-Bober (Sudbury, MA)



156. Tina Lane (New York, NY),



157. Erika Lane (Westchester, NY)



158.Jennifer Prosky (Bellmore, NY)



159. Liza Baron (Bethesda, MD)



160. Katharine Schulmann (Bethesda, MD)



161. Sarah Dotts (Huntsville, AL)



162. Allison Wilner (Newburyport, MA)



163. Meredith Lorenz (Austin, Texas)



164. Katherine Lorenz (Austin, TX)



165. Kate Seely (San Francisco, CA)



166. Molly May (Greenwich, CT)



167. Eliza Dabney (Bozeman, MT)



168. Grant Taylor (Castleton, VA)



169. Eve Bruneau (Lebanon, NH)



170. Susan Elliott (Etna, NH)



171. Jeremie Marko



172. Bonnie Marko (CA)



173. Diamond Braverman (Pioneertown, Ca)


174. Cherie Currie (CA)

[Tard]

Jeeze. Did you have to repost all of that JUST to add #175? [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]

[rocketmaster]

How I Stole Your Election
by George W. Bush

The first thing I did to steal your election was to make friends
with ALL the manufacturers and code-verifiers of the Electronic
Voting Machines. They were really nice, especially Diebold who gave
me $600,000 for my campaign. Wow, thanks dude!

http://nuclearfree.lynx.co.nz/stealing.htm

Next, I had my attack dog, Karl Rove, convince these companies to
either alter the vote totals on the central tabulator machines
(simple PCs running windows using Remote Access Server -- RAS), or
reprogram (via a downloadable software patch) the voting machines
themselves so that they would give the advantage to ME! Isn't
America great?!? A little money and some religious zealotry goes a
looooong, loooong way. Oh, the religious zealotry thing? That's
just a cover. I'm not really a Christian -- or at least I don't act
like one. Anyway, I digress.

http://www.ejfi.org/Voting/Voting-25.htm#rig

Did you ever hear the media complaining about how inaccurate the
exit polls were in prior elections? No. That's because they
basically ARE accurate. But this election, the exit polls showed
Kerry WAY ahead. No problem. My buddies rigged the machines (and
all they needed to do was rig it in one state, Ohio, but they took
care of at least Florida for me too) not only to make me squeak by
in the important battleground states, like Florida and Ohio, but
they also made sure that when I did get a state that I was expected
to win, the margin was HUGE so that my "popular" vote would make it
look like I had a mandate.

So let's recap how the popular vote thing worked again. Let's say
we didn't want it to look suspicious by taking states that Kerry
really would have won (except for Ohio and Florida, gotta take
those! heh heh). So we let him win there, but in order once again
to boost the "popular" vote (I put that in quotes because as you
know, I'm not REALLY popular), we bring my vote tallies RIGHT UP
NEXT to Kerry's, to jack up the "popular" vote as much as possible,
even if I didn't win the state.

Then, with states like North Carolina, we know we're going to steal
the state anyway (at least according to what the exit polls were
telling everyone.... and according to the long, long lines of new
voters were telling everyone ... because we all know most of those
people were voting for Kerry, not the status quo), so we just jack
the **** out of the vote total to REALLY stuff a crapload of
"popular" votes in my pocket. You see, this way I can get on the TV
and declare that I have a "mandate" and that I'm going to "cash in"
on my political "capital" (which I don't really have of course, but
we made it look that way).

Here's a nice chart to show you what I mean. Take special note of
how the electronic voting machine totals compare to the paper ballot
totals. And see what I mean about North Carolina?
http://www.bandsagainstbush.org/cgi-.../exit_poll.gif

Look folks, if you really want me out of office, first you're going
to have to impeach me. But you know what, if you don't have
verifiable paper trails at the polls like these folks recommend (
http://openvotingconsortium.org/ ), and if you don't take these
voting machines out of the hands of private companies that are
aligned with one end of the political spectrum, then I'm gonna just
continue to hose you (and then my brother Jeb will be president too
cause we're into this dynasty thing, kind of like my buddies the
Saudis... ain't it cool?!?). Also, in 2006, we're going to steal
about five more senate seats, and then we'll have the
"super-majority". That means the Democrats can't do that confounded
fillerbs... fillas.... fillbusters.... **** , well, they can't get in
the darn way any more and we can pass ANY laws we want about
ANYTHING and put whoever we want on the Supreme court. Ha ha, then
you're REALLY screwed. So if you don't fix this mess (I mean great
system) in two years and have a verifiable voting system nationwide,
America is MINE!!!!! (and Jeb's and my daddy's and Cheney's and
Rove's... hey, we could even pass a law saying I could be president
for FOUR MORE YEARS after 2008! That would be SOOO cool!) Anyway,
I digress once again.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHI411B.html

And that pesky Bev Harris. Man I wish she would go away. If too
many of you contribute to her cause, I might just get in trouble so
KNOCK IT OFF!!

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

I've said it before and I'll say it again, "Fool me once.....", oh
**** , I forgot again. Well how about this? "This would be a heck
of lot easier if this was [grammar incorrect] a dictatorship....
just so long as I'm the dictator. Heh, heh." Well, sorry to say
folks, but I got my way. What are you gonna do about it, huh?
Bring it on!!!

http://votergate.tv/votergate/voterg...movie_64kb.mov

"Sincerely" Yours,
"President" George W. Bush

P.S. Pass it on! I dare ya.



Carl Whitmarsh
Houston
TexasDemocrat-ALWAYS!

"Life isn't like a box of chocolates ... It's more like a jar of
jalapenos ... What you do today, might burn your *** tomorrow!"
How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?